It looks a very open Arkle which makes a great race but on paper at this stage there doesn’t look to be a star amongst them like we usually have to look forward to going chasing
That would be my view at this stage as well. Once you take out the likes of Laurina, Klassical Dream, City Island, Band of Outlaws, Malone Road, Samcro, Champ, Fusil Raffles, Reserve Tank, Elixir de Nutz you're left with in my opinion a pretty level playing field outside of:
Melon - by far the class horse in the race. Have made my doubts known on him earlier in the thread though at least with getting him onside this early on.
Thomas Darby - I really should be backing him at 25/1 for this with cashout but all his runs to me suggest he needs further to really show what he can do and bring out the best in him. 2nd in the Supreme arguably the strongest piece of novice form in the market and the only gripe really right now is my own perception and interpretation of his runs last year.
Agree that
Al Dancer may well be found out over fences like it could be viewed he was in March. I wasn't a huge fan last season and didn't once back him for any of his races. Once he won the Betfair his price for me was too short for a Supreme and i've never liked that as a prep run however I do think he looks to have plenty of attributes that should make him do very well over fences at 2 miles and a quick fast pace jumping at speed. Something where I question some horses who have slightly more evidence or substance to their form want.
I think at the very least he'll be right up there in the early season trials and a much shorter price. No reason to think fences won't bring him on and it's certainly the discipline to bring the best out of him according to everyone connected to the horse. Even when his 'stock' was at his peak having won the Betfair, connections were continuing to say how the coming season(s) over fences would be the making of him.
I could easily be looking back in 4-5 months time and go yeah turns out the Supreme was no fluke and he just isn't good enough but i'm a lot more forgiving of 1 bad run with a horse than I used to be. The fact they didn't get him out after means the judgement on him is very much at a crossroads to whether he was better than that and it was just a blip or that he just isn't
that good. 33/1 is enough to get me to go with the former.
My biggest concern is the fact that Tom Segal likes him so much :highly_amused: