Originally posted by Scooby91
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Fat Jockey Patrons
Fat Jockey is a horse racing community focused on all the big races in the UK and Ireland. We don't charge users but if you have found the site useful then any support towards the running costs is appreciated.
Become a Patron!
You can also make a one-off donation here:
Become a Patron!
You can also make a one-off donation here:
See more
See less
Arkle 2019
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by doctorwu View PostI'll be to busy enjoying LR at the track to find time to visit this thread. And I have CE any race 25/1 but can't see him being quite good enough.
No worry that LR might not have his ideal ground? Albeit good in the description.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jack1092 View PostWhats that based on doc?
No worry that LR might not have his ideal ground? Albeit good in the description.
As for CE, I'm a big fan, as you'll see from past postings but its a tall order winning an Arkle off a beginners chase win. To call CE a shoe-in is bonkers talk.
Comment
-
Originally posted by doctorwu View PostIm not worried at the moment. Things can change and we could get ground like last year. LR has form over 2.4 so I'm not unduly worried.
As for CE, I'm a big fan, as you'll see from past postings but its a tall order winning an Arkle off a beginners chase win. To call CE a shoe-in is bonkers talk.
Comment
-
Originally posted by doctorwu View PostI'll be to busy enjoying LR at the track to find time to visit this thread. And I have CE any race 25/1 but can't see him being quite good enough.
Comment
-
LR is the solid contender basically as he's made hay while he's had his ground. Probably will get away with g/s let's be honest.
Is he a top notcher? Not for me, he's very good. Wide open race, i would rather have seen CE get a second run too..
Comment
-
Originally posted by jack1092 View PostLR is the solid contender basically as he's made hay while he's had his ground. Probably will get away with g/s let's be honest.
Is he a top notcher? Not for me, he's very good. Wide open race, i would rather have seen CE get a second run too..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Native River View PostI might've gone a bit mental with the lack of racing but I do feel 33/1 is too high for Mengli Khan, and looking at his form and his 3 runs at Leopardstown could it be he struggles at the course? His first run was when he decided to jump the wing, then a 4th & 3rd, you take that out and his form is fantastic and we know he can handle the hill as he came up it well in the Supreme and hopefully better ground to suit who knows....
Stinks of clutching at straws this
Comment
-
Originally posted by charlie View PostDefinitely not top notch, but LR backers will argue he doesn't have to be given what he is likely to face. As a side note, LR would not be as popular as he is were he owned by David Staddon and trained by Kayley Woollacott
Comment
-
Originally posted by westcountry1 View PostSpot on Charlie. I really hope that Dave's resistance to sell his horse for huge money pay's off for him. But from a personal point of view I want Lalor to prove that he is the horse that Rich 'Woolly' always believed him to be. Kayley is doing a great job with him and he is in amazing shape...bring on the Arkle.
Comment
-
Originally posted by charlie View PostLe Richebourg has benefitted from running on the good ground he wants of late, but his form in any race of note with a view to this on soft/heavy doesn't read particularly well, including at Cheltenham last year. Probably a worthy fav in a race that lacks depth, but Simon Claise will no doubt water for the first day of festival if it's not soft already, that will significantly reduce his chances over a course we can't be sure suits (ground definitely counted against him last year). Can see LR being absolutely smashed up on the day like an absolute certainty, and then getting beat.
I don't like Kalashnikov and if he were mine he would go JLT. Winner comes from Lalor or Cilaos Emery IMO.
Personally for me i'd be siding with Kalashnikov if the ground was soft or worse.
Comment
Comment