Announcement

Collapse

Fat Jockey Patrons

Fat Jockey is a horse racing community focused on all the big races in the UK and Ireland. We don't charge users but if you have found the site useful then any support towards the running costs is appreciated.
Become a Patron!

You can also make a one-off donation here:
See more
See less

Rich Ricci is chairman of Betbright

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rich Ricci is chairman of Betbright

    Just noticed this.

    Is Rich Ricci, the ex-Barclays investment banker turned racehorse owner, poised to add a stake in a betting company to his stable of thoroughbreds?


    and he confirmed in an interview with Lydia on Djakadam thread.

    While it makes Betbright more credible in my eyes how can this happen - does it not mean he is effectively laying his own horses ?

    Is there some loophole because horses are in his wifes name ?

  • #2
    mayo - thanks for this.

    I posted in anotehr thread just now that I don't agree with any bookmaker/racehorse owner relationship but it has been going on for years, Paddy Power being the most notable current/recent one.
    But it's not right in my eyes....

    Comment


    • #3
      Victor Chandler had a few horses. Zaynar was one of his.

      Obligatory ad

      Comment


      • #4
        Fair play to him.

        With Betfair and Paddy Power merging that leaves room for one more account.

        Will it be worth watching their odds on his runners ?

        and will Rubys blog be on the move.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Yeehaa View Post
          Will it be worth watching their odds on his runners ?

          I think this is the issue Yeehaa, the relationship means that you are considering other factors than the horses abilities/form etc.
          If one of Ricci's is 5/2 across the board then BetBright go 7/4 what's the market reaction going to be ?
          It's unhealthy and muddies the waters for me

          Comment


          • #6
            Here is the rule ...Mrs Ricci owns the horses but nothing technically wrong anyway see 92.4.


            92. Restrictions on laying to lose

            92.1 In Paragraph 92.2, Listed Person

            92.1.1 means any owner of a horse (see Rule 96), and
            92.1.2 additionally, includes

            92.1.2.1 where the owner is a Recognised Company, any director or Registered Agent of the company,
            92.1.2.2 where the owner is a Recognised Stud Company, any director of the company,
            92.1.2.3 where the owner is a Racing Partnership, the partners of the racing partnership who are notified to the Authority under Rule 65.1.2 and who are not Nominated Partners,
            92.1.2.4 where the horse is subject to a lease, the lessor of the horse, and
            92.1.2.5 where the horse is jointly-owned, is leased for one race only or is subject to any other lease or arrangement registered under Rule 75, any Person who, at or around the material time, played an active part in managing the horse.

            92.2 A Listed Person must not

            92.2.1 lay any horse he owns with a Betting Organisation to lose a race,
            92.2.2 instruct another Person to do so on his behalf, or
            92.2.3 receive the whole or any part of any proceeds of such a lay.

            92.3 Any reference to laying a horse to lose includes any single instance of doing so, whether or not the single instance was, or was intended to be, one of a series of betting arrangements.
            92.4 Nothing in this Rule prevents the laying of any horse owned by a Betting Organisation in the ordinary course of that Betting Organisation's business.
            92.5 Betting Organisation means

            92.5.1 any bookmaker,
            92.5.2 the Tote,
            92.5.3 any company offering spread betting on horseracing or person-to-person betting exchanges on horseracing, and
            92.5.4 the employees of any such organisations

            Last edited by Lester; 26 January 2016, 05:47 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Greg Wood running a story about Betbright not being an ABP.

              It will be a blow to the credibility of the Authorised Betting Partner plan if a company which has appointed such a high-profile owner as its chairman refuses to sign up


              BetBright’s deal at Cheltenham concludes at the end of next season but it will still be a blow to the credibility of the ABP campaign if a company which has appointed such a high-profile owner as its chairman refuses to sign up. It will also cast a sharp light on comments by Mullins before last year’s Festival, when he suggested the prize money on offer at the Festival was “not fair and not on”, and should be “at least doubled, if not more” to reflect the sums owners such as Ricci pay for young jumping stock.

              The BHA said on Wednesday it had “written to all bookmakers, including BetBright,” with details of the ABP scheme and that “the process of speaking to the betting industry to outline the benefits of becoming an Authorised Betting Partner is ongoing.”

              “At the moment we sponsor some fantastic races at Cheltenham, Doncaster and Kempton,” Brian Farrell, BetBright’s marketing director, said, “and will consider our options once these sponsorships come to an end. For now, we are focusing on working hard to make our sponsorships as successful as possible and engage with real racing fans. We do have a desire to continue to use race sponsorships as part of our brand building and marketing strategy.”
              Advertisement

              Ricci had three winners at last year’s Festival but the fall of his runner Annie Power in the Mares’ Hurdle on the opening day was estimated to have saved the bookmaking industry many millions of pounds, as the mare would have completed many thousands of Yankees and other accumulator bets on four hot favourites from the Mullins stable.

              Some punters may feel uneasy about the chairman of a bookmaker having such a close interest in horses that could do significant damage to the betting industry’s profits in March. Others may wonder whether BetBright will lay all requested bets on Ricci’s horses in full at advertised prices or, as is often the case with online operators, either restrict stakes or refuse bets altogether.

              British racing has a long history of bookmakers owning horses, however. William Hill and Victor Chandler among those to have owned major winners. More recently, Michael Tabor, the former owner of the Arthur Prince betting shop chain and now leading member of the powerful Coolmore ownership syndicate on the Flat, bought Chandler’s company BetVictor.

              The BHA’s rules on laying by owners state that it is an offence for any owner “to lay any horse he owns with a Betting Organisation to lose a race, instruct another person to do so on his behalf or receive the whole or part of any proceeds of such a lay.” Only last week, owner Alan Findlay was banned from racing eight years for laying his own horses on Betfair.

              However, the rules also make it clear that “nothing in this rule prevents the laying of any horse owned by a Betting Organisation in the ordinary course of that Betting Organisation’s business”.

              Ricci, who has invested many millions of pounds in National Hunt racing, lives in Britain but stables his horses exclusively with Mullins in County Carlow. He was a high-profile figure in banking and finance, and was one of a number of senior executives to leave Barclays’ investment arm in the wake of the Libor rate-fixing scandal which engulfed the bank in the summer of 2012

              Comment

              Working...
              X