Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Crowdfunder - Fat Jockey Forum upgrade

Hello Fat Jockeys,

Upgrading the Fat Jockey forum!: https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/p/fatjockeyforum

We're looking to upgrade the 'hosting CPU' so I've set up a crowdfunding project.

I would love it if you could donate using the link below to access my project page. Any contribution large or small will be hugely appreciated. Thank you.

Kevloaf @ Fat Jockey
2 of 2 < >

Fat Jockey Patrons

HELP US - Become a Patron - Fat Jockey is a horse racing community focused on all the big races in the UK and Ireland. We don't charge users but if you have found the site useful then any support towards the running costs is appreciated ... a small donation each month would be a huge contribution.
Become a Patron!
See more
See less

2025 Mares Hurdle

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rooster Booster
    replied
    Originally posted by Quevega View Post
    The way elliot speaks today about BDA seems like they will announce early, in which case this gives Lossie a potential headache.
    I'd have BDA a lot closer to C Hill than 9/4 NRNB and Lossie would also be a lot shorter than 5/4 NRNB mares.
    Related double seems obvious. with cash out.
    Yep so would I. There’s something not sitting quite right with me about CH. Hendo et al would have known that connections of one of his biggest rivals were looking for an excuse to bail. What better excuse than seeing CH put in a performance to justify taking the safer option,not necessarily sensational, but good enough. Instead they chose to let him do little more than a strong gallop. Are they themselves doubting whether he is in fact the same horse and are too afraid to show what’s under the bonnet in case it’s not what they hope. Maybe paranoia on my part but it sat a little uneasy with me at the time and I haven’t been able to shift that feeling since.

    Leave a comment:


  • Quevega
    replied
    The way elliot speaks today about BDA seems like they will announce early, in which case this gives Lossie a potential headache/option.
    If they announce for the champion and Townend is choosing State Man then the ears of Ricci will be ringing with thoughts and comments to go for the mares.

    I'd have BDA a lot closer to C Hill than 9/4 NRNB and Lossie would also be a lot shorter than 5/4 NRNB mares.
    Related double seems obvious. with cash out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rooster Booster
    replied
    Originally posted by Craigy14 View Post
    Wary of each other but not the best hurdler potentially we have ever seen

    Find it bizarre that the mares are ‘avoiding’ each other. I know Elliott said ‘there’s a mare Lossiemouth’ when asked about the champion I think it was but she’s hardly done much since those comments. I very much like Lossiemouth as well and think she’d take BDA over either trip. I think BDA got away with one at Xmas that day and tactics were genius but her only chance of a Cheltenham win is the mares with no Lossie imo. There is zero chance they get away with those tactics again imo.
    So you think Lossiemouth would have beaten her that day?

    Leave a comment:


  • Carnage at Taunton
    replied
    Originally posted by Craigy14 View Post
    Wary of each other but not the best hurdler potentially we have ever seen

    Find it bizarre that the mares are ‘avoiding’ each other. I know Elliott said ‘there’s a mare Lossiemouth’ when asked about the champion I think it was but she’s hardly done much since those comments. I very much like Lossiemouth as well and think she’d take BDA over either trip. I think BDA got away with one at Xmas that day and tactics were genius but her only chance of a Cheltenham win is the mares with no Lossie imo. There is zero chance they get away with those tactics again imo.
    I would side with BDA and I hope they face each other so we can find out
    My gut says not

    Leave a comment:


  • Craigy14
    replied
    Wary of each other but not the best hurdler potentially we have ever seen

    Find it bizarre that the mares are ‘avoiding’ each other. I know Elliott said ‘there’s a mare Lossiemouth’ when asked about the champion I think it was but she’s hardly done much since those comments. I very much like Lossiemouth as well and think she’d take BDA over either trip. I think BDA got away with one at Xmas that day and tactics were genius but her only chance of a Cheltenham win is the mares with no Lossie imo. There is zero chance they get away with those tactics again imo.

    Leave a comment:


  • Carnage at Taunton
    replied
    Originally posted by archie View Post

    Why should she fear Lossiemouth in the Mares but not the Champion?
    You are right she should
    Was just thinking if BDA went Ch, then maybe L would go mares
    if they clashed anywhere I think they would be very wary of each other

    Leave a comment:


  • archie
    replied
    Originally posted by Carnage at Taunton View Post

    Only big opponents BDA can have from what I’ve seen are CH in the CH , and Lossie in the Mares.
    Why should she fear Lossiemouth in the Mares but not the Champion?

    Leave a comment:


  • Istabraq
    replied
    Originally posted by darlojim View Post

    Betvictor, spreadex and sportingindex


    Oooo Im shaking in my boots
    Sporting Index and Spreadex are the same company, well right now they are though though the monopolies commission have other plans...

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobos
    replied
    Originally posted by darlojim View Post

    Betvictor, spreadex and sportingindex


    Oooo Im shaking in my boots
    Betfair as well......don't be cheeky

    Leave a comment:


  • darlojim
    replied
    Originally posted by Carnage at Taunton View Post


    That it??!!
    Didnt bother to look as I was pretty sure it would be something like that.
    Should be a ban for this type of stuff.

    Leave a comment:


  • Carnage at Taunton
    replied
    Originally posted by Lobos View Post

    Clutching now Carnage.

    Bloody hope you are right though !!!!
    165 to 144 suggests poles apart to me

    Leave a comment:


  • Carnage at Taunton
    replied
    Originally posted by darlojim View Post

    Betvictor, spreadex and sportingindex


    Oooo Im shaking in my boots

    That it??!!
    Didnt bother to look as I was pretty sure it would be something like that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobos
    replied
    Originally posted by Carnage at Taunton View Post

    In the hope BDA don’t run I expect.
    They are poles apart.
    Clutching now Carnage.

    Bloody hope you are right though !!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • darlojim
    replied
    Originally posted by Lobos View Post
    Just looking now her odds have drifted a bit with Jade being backed so there has already been ripples.
    Betvictor, spreadex and sportingindex


    Oooo Im shaking in my boots

    Leave a comment:


  • Carnage at Taunton
    replied
    Originally posted by Lobos View Post
    Just looking now her odds have drifted a bit with Jade being backed so there has already been ripples.
    In the hope BDA don’t run I expect.
    They are poles apart.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X