Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Crowdfunder - Fat Jockey Forum upgrade

Hello Fat Jockeys,

Upgrading the Fat Jockey forum!: https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/p/fatjockeyforum

We're looking to upgrade the 'hosting CPU' so I've set up a crowdfunding project.

I would love it if you could donate using the link below to access my project page. Any contribution large or small will be hugely appreciated. Thank you.

Kevloaf @ Fat Jockey
2 of 2 < >

Fat Jockey Patrons

HELP US - Become a Patron - Fat Jockey is a horse racing community focused on all the big races in the UK and Ireland. We don't charge users but if you have found the site useful then any support towards the running costs is appreciated ... a small donation each month would be a huge contribution.
Become a Patron!
See more
See less

2025 Mares Hurdle

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • HarryTrotter
    replied
    I’m with Kev on this one. I’ve had a nagging doubt since the fall last time out that they will switch Lossiemouth last minute to the mares. Will sight the normal stuff like ‘it wasn’t the plan, but off the back of the fall’. Kinda reminds me of the late Vautour switch (different circumstances obviously), but wouldn’t put it past them

    Leave a comment:


  • Craigy14
    replied
    She’s a lot bigger on the exchange so wouldn’t surprise if it’s the bookies cutting to draw folk in, as Ista says they do from time to time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hardy Eustace
    replied
    It is weird, yeah.

    there’s been zero talk of her going here.

    Don’t get me wrong, 11/8 to win the mares is mad value with BDA seemingly going champion.

    But who’s using up that much of their betting bank backing a 11/8 shot now when there’s so much else out there and such a chance that she doesn’t run here.

    so yeah i suppose it is _that_ weird!

    Leave a comment:


  • Kevloaf
    replied
    Originally posted by punterorplonker View Post
    Lossie tonight getting backed for this... Wierd
    Is it that weird?

    I still hope I'm wrong but one of the Mares running here has been 1.01 all season



    I think if BDA goes CH then Lossie moves here and Paul sticks with the reigning CH and current ICH winner, State Man ...... and rides with confidence on the back of an odds on win in this race....

    Leave a comment:


  • Eggs
    replied
    Originally posted by punterorplonker View Post
    Lossie tonight getting backed for this... Wierd
    ….maybe something said at a preview night.

    Leave a comment:


  • punterorplonker
    replied
    Lossie tonight getting backed for this... Wierd

    Leave a comment:


  • Eggs
    replied
    ….Dysart;

    She goes for the Mares’ Hurdle, and I am very happy with her. She is in a great old place, and we are hoping she comes back to her very best this spring. (Fergal O’Brien)​

    Leave a comment:


  • Eggs
    replied
    Originally posted by The hill View Post
    Golden Ace doubtful to make the festival.

    Update now may still get there could just be a niggle (twitter)

    Leave a comment:


  • The hill
    replied
    Golden Ace doubtful to make the festival.

    Update now may still get there could just be a niggle (twitter)
    Last edited by The hill; 23 February 2025, 02:09 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eggs
    replied
    ….Mullins;

    Jade De Grugy made her comeback after having some training problems earlier in the season. We were very pleased with how she handled conditions and she looks set on her way for the Mares' Hurdle at Cheltenham.​‘

    Leave a comment:


  • Frankely My Dear
    replied
    Originally posted by Rooster Booster View Post

    Not stupid but definitely rhetorical
    As in no-one wants to risk answering it!

    Leave a comment:


  • Rooster Booster
    replied
    Originally posted by Frankely My Dear View Post

    Probably one for the stupid question thread (and sorry Kev, arguably pointless) but would you rather have marriage and poor health or good health and no marriage??
    Not stupid but definitely rhetorical

    Leave a comment:


  • Frankely My Dear
    replied
    Originally posted by Lobos View Post

    For the sake of my health and more importantly my marriage...........I'll have to. ​​​
    Probably one for the stupid question thread (and sorry Kev, arguably pointless) but would you rather have marriage and poor health or good health and no marriage??

    Leave a comment:


  • Lobos
    replied
    Originally posted by Kevloaf View Post


    Properly on the wind up aren't you

    If we made a new rule ... and you had to add value with each post, do you think you'd post as often?

    I'd post less too..... but for the good of the forum, can you reign it in a bit? I will too
    For the sake of my health and more importantly my marriage...........I'll have to. ​​​

    Leave a comment:


  • Kevloaf
    replied
    Originally posted by Lobos View Post

    What he said.........

    Properly on the wind up aren't you

    If we made a new rule ... and you had to add value with each post, do you think you'd post as often?

    I'd post less too..... but for the good of the forum, can you reign it in a bit? I will too

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X