Originally posted by Carnage at Taunton
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Fat Jockey Patrons
Fat Jockey is a horse racing community focused on all the big races in the UK and Ireland. We don't charge users but if you have found the site useful then any support towards the running costs is appreciated.
Become a Patron!
You can also make a one-off donation here:
Become a Patron!
You can also make a one-off donation here:
See more
See less
2025 Champion Chase
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Carnage at Taunton View Post
More inclined to think he’s a dodgy unreliable sort myself
The one mitigating factor of course is the C and D though his Arkle winning time was over 16 seconds above standard and nearly 4 seconds slower than Jonbon when he won his first Schloer on similar ground and over 11 seconds slower than when Jonbon won his second Schloer on quicker ground (Jonbon also carried 3 pounds more on both occasions). For me GW simply won’t be quick enough on soft ground or quicker.
I would be interested in any horse that has shown even on only one occasion that he could perform to the level required to win a given race but personally I’d want bigger than 5s.Nick Luck thinks the exact opposite as he called him out as the horse that represents outstanding value right now so it’s certainly a game of opinions
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster Booster View Post
He’s actually surprisingly consistent with nine of his last 11 RPRs ranging between 150 and 159. The Arkle and the match up with F2F being the two outliers. So for all the talk of left handed right handed , courses he likes and dislikes most of the evidence suggests that’s his ability and he produces that range of performance almost every time and on what is now a fairly significant back catalogue of work only one performance entitles him to be so close to Jonbon in the market. Both in my work and in punting I have learnt to be wary of outliers at both ends of the scale.
The one mitigating factor of course is the C and D though his Arkle winning time was over 16 seconds above standard and nearly 4 seconds slower than Jonbon when he won his first Schloer on similar ground and over 11 seconds slower than when Jonbon won his second Schloer on quicker ground (Jonbon also carried 3 pounds more on both occasions). For me GW simply won’t be quick enough on soft ground or quicker.
I would be interested in any horse that has shown even on only one occasion that he could perform to the level required to win a given race but personally I’d want bigger than 5s.Nick Luck thinks the exact opposite as he called him out as the horse that represents outstanding value right now so it’s certainly a game of opinions
Gaelics arkle has to have been close to Heavy as the rest of the races that day were officially Heavy- they changed it after his race.
And bonbons shloer this year ?
Is Gaelic quicker than boothill and edwardstone ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Quevega View Post
To counter this on the timings side. And you doubting his speed/pace
Gaelics arkle has to have been close to Heavy as the rest of the races that day were officially Heavy- they changed it after his race.
And bonbons shloer this year ?
Is Gaelic quicker than boothill and edwardstone ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Quevega View Post
To counter this on the timings side. And you doubting his speed/pace
Gaelics arkle has to have been close to Heavy as the rest of the races that day were officially Heavy- they changed it after his race.
And bonbons shloer this year ?
Is Gaelic quicker than boothill and edwardstone ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster Booster View Post
He’s actually surprisingly consistent with nine of his last 11 RPRs ranging between 150 and 159. The Arkle and the match up with F2F being the two outliers. So for all the talk of left handed right handed , courses he likes and dislikes most of the evidence suggests that’s his ability and he produces that range of performance almost every time and on what is now a fairly significant back catalogue of work only one performance entitles him to be so close to Jonbon in the market. Both in my work and in punting I have learnt to be wary of outliers at both ends of the scale.
The one mitigating factor of course is the C and D though his Arkle winning time was over 16 seconds above standard and nearly 4 seconds slower than Jonbon when he won his first Schloer on similar ground and over 11 seconds slower than when Jonbon won his second Schloer on quicker ground (Jonbon also carried 3 pounds more on both occasions). For me GW simply won’t be quick enough on soft ground or quicker.
I would be interested in any horse that has shown even on only one occasion that he could perform to the level required to win a given race but personally I’d want bigger than 5s.Nick Luck thinks the exact opposite as he called him out as the horse that represents outstanding value right now so it’s certainly a game of opinions
Probably would have been more accurate to say that i personally would think long and hard before taking the odds on offer unless as some sort of cover in case he produces a performance that improves from his Arkle victory , because imo he’s well capable of producing his performance against FTF when put under pressure.
Thats what I meant by unreliable, particularly going left handed imo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Carnage at Taunton View Post
Well I guess that’s proved me wrong in saying he’s a dodgy unreliable type
Probably would have been more accurate to say that i personally would think long and hard before taking the odds on offer unless as some sort of cover in case he produces a performance that improves from his Arkle victory , because imo he’s well capable of producing his performance against FTF when put under pressure.
Thats what I meant by unreliable, particularly going left handed imo.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rooster Booster View Post
I guess I just meant that outliers are the data points that are typically removed and considered unreliable. This means an econemetrician or statistician would discard his Arkle win and his defeat behind F2F and conclude that the remaining significant number of data points were the more reliable ones. This makes GW a high 150s horse with an awful lot to find still. Personally I do believe he is capable if putting in a 170 plus performance when all of the stars are aligned but I think it to be less likely than his current odds suggest and even if he does it could easily still not be enough to beat Jonbon.
Interesting stuff that
Comment
-
Originally posted by Carnage at Taunton View Post
You actually think that’s how we measure Jonbon’s chances??!!!
He has been consistently below par at Cheltenham.
I know you think Nico will make a big difference come March as you seem to think he proved in this years schloer. But he didn't though did he ?
Jonbon will want it to be on the soft side this March also IMO, and I think at 5-1 vs 2-1 Gaelic is the bet.
I share the same views as others though and Gaelic price may hold/drift if he disappoints at Leopardstown again.
But I doubt his SP will be much worse than 5-1, although he could make a right hash of Leopardstown so you never know.
Comment
Comment