To win TODAY and at the Festival

[fatherjohn]

some tempting boosts from hills for blue lord

win plus any race 40s
win plus ballymore 50s
place this weekend and place at ballymore 9/2

[Eggs]

....Sky have;

Espoir de Romay win Saturday & a/r 50-1.

With a forecast cold few days I suppose there has to be a doubt about this weekends racing.

[Eggs]

......a few more with Hills;

Bob Ollinger & Ballymore 20-1
Master Tommytucker & 1st 3 in GC 25-1; & win GC 100-1.

[Eggs]

some tempting boosts from hills for blue lord

win plus any race 40s
win plus ballymore 50s
place this weekend and place at ballymore 9/2

....those prices have had a haircut;

Blue Lord 1st 3 & 1st 3 (Bal): win & a/r 25-1; win & (Ball) 33-1

Nassalam & TH 14-1 Hills; 20-1 Sky

Imperial Aura win tomorrow & Epatante (CH), Envoi (MC), Capt Guinness 1st 3 (Ark) 40-1 Hills

[Topofthegame2021]

Imperial Aura win tomorrow & Epatante (CH), Envoi (MC), Capt Guinness 1st 3 (Ark) 40-1 Hills

Like the look of this - boosted to 44/1 & taken

[The King Pimm]

Some nice prices there Eggs but my concern is that even if they win tomorrow will they win at the Festival. Nassalam could bolt up tomorrow but still not be good enough to win the Triumph. I’ll probably cover Nassalam & Blue Lord but not convinced they are both good enough. I hope I’m proved wrong tomorrow

[FinalFurlong91]

......a few more with Hills;

Bob Ollinger & Ballymore 20-1
Master Tommytucker & 1st 3 in GC 25-1; & win GC 100-1.

Thats a good price on Bob ollinger

Say he goes off 6/4 wins and is cut to 4/1-5/1 that pays 11.5/1-14/1

[Eggs]

Some nice prices there Eggs but my concern is that even if they win tomorrow will they win at the Festival. Nassalam could bolt up tomorrow but still not be good enough to win the Triumph. I’ll probably cover Nassalam & Blue Lord but not convinced they are both good enough. I hope I’m proved wrong tomorrow

...I think that’s the question you always have to ask for these offers, TKP. The bottom line is whether you want them onside in your portfolio, or you might want to top up what you already have.

Its a good market to play but I suggest you have to be quite selective on what you take up.

[The King Pimm]

...I think that’s the question you always have to ask for these offers, TKP. The bottom line is whether you want them onside in your portfolio, or you might want to top up what you already have.

Its a good market to play but I suggest you have to be quite selective on what you take up.

Some of them can be great value post race. I was on the Metier double for the Tolworth/Supreme last Saturday and seeing how much his price had been cut post race I’m very glad I did. I then lost on the 4 to win today bets I placed on the Sunday in Ireland so it’s a bit of a burnt wallet talking here also. I think I’ll back Nasslam for tomorrow as I was going top up on him anyway but will probably leave the rest as the Lawlors looks a potential tricky race for Bob Olinger

[Lobos]

...I think that’s the question you always have to ask for these offers, TKP. The bottom line is whether you want them onside in your portfolio, or you might want to top up what you already have.

Its a good market to play but I suggest you have to be quite selective on what you take up.

Absolutely. It's so easy to get sucked in by what appears attractive odds. However, there's no point getting involved at all unless you actually believe they have a very good chance of winning at the Fez. If you've not backed them by now as singles then the chances are you don't fancy them anyway so don't get involved. Plus, if you already have enough on a horse don't be greedy and feel that you need to 'top up'. Being selective and more importantly disciplined when betting AP is the two most important things I've learned over the years.

[Eggs]

Some of them can be great value post race. I was on the Metier double for the Tolworth/Supreme last Saturday and seeing how much his price had been cut post race I’m very glad I did. I then lost on the 4 to win today bets I placed on the Sunday in Ireland so it’s a bit of a burnt wallet talking here also. I think I’ll back Nasslam for tomorrow as I was going top up on him anyway but will probably leave the rest as the Lawlors looks a potential tricky race for Bob Olinger

....yep, I’m chuffed with some of the ones I had an interest in. It also gives a little interest in a race outcome where you might not have backed one.

I captured Metier offer too. One of my favourites is the 250-1 Cloth Cap winning the Ladbroke/National & 25-1 place. It was a horse I was going to back anyway but for a small stake I now have a decent potential return.

[Eggs]

....Sky have;

Imperial Aura & Ryanair 9-1
McFabulous & Stayers 33-1

[isitmarchyet]

Riders on the Storm today + Ryanair 33/1
Master Tommytucker today + Ryanair 40/1

Both w/Sky

[Rooster Booster]

Absolutely. It's so easy to get sucked in by what appears attractive odds. However, there's no point getting involved at all unless you actually believe they have a very good chance of winning at the Fez. If you've not backed them by now as singles then the chances are you don't fancy them anyway so don't get involved. Plus, if you already have enough on a horse don't be greedy and feel that you need to 'top up'. Being selective and more importantly disciplined when betting AP is the two most important things I've learned over the years.

I generally agree with this with the exception of horses where you have relatively few data points on and have not covered in a market. Blue Lord for me is the perfect example. I have no idea how good he is and I don’t mind admitting it. The 50s originally on offer (40s AR) were a no brainier for me and a way of me covering a potential exposure with little outlay. It would have been an unnecessary risk not to cover him when only the race Sunday would provide sufficient information for me to have a strong opinion on the horse.

[Eggs]

I generally agree with this with the exception of horses where you have relatively few data points on and have not covered in a market. Blue Lord for me is the perfect example. I have no idea how good he is and I don’t mind admitting it. The 50s originally on offer (40s AR) were a no brainier for me and a way of me covering a potential exposure with little outlay. It would have been an unnecessary risk not to cover him when only the race Sunday would provide sufficient information for me to have a strong opinion on the horse.

...yep, another I’ve had a little interest in (a/r) for exactly the same reason. Blue Lord has been highlighted on this site by a number of posters, so it is an opportunity to get it in the bag at a fancy price.