Even with NRNB I can't help help myself but factor in the probability of a horse showing up or else it's too easy to find yourself tying up an endless amount of stake. At these sort of prices though I don't mind so much, and I don't think it's too farfetched to see him here.
Announcement
Collapse
Fat Jockey Patrons
Fat Jockey is a horse racing community focused on all the big races in the UK and Ireland. We don't charge users but if you have found the site useful then any support towards the running costs is appreciated.
Become a Patron!
You can also make a one-off donation here:
Become a Patron!
You can also make a one-off donation here:
See more
See less
The ULTIMA Handicap Chase
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Kevloaf View Post
Just going back 10 years:
2011 - no runner
2012 - no runner
2013 - no runner
2014 - no runner
2015 - no runner
2016 - no runner
2017 - Noble Endeavour (3rd at 15/2) and Clarcam (9th at 50/1)
2018 - no runner
2019 - Noble Endeavour (10th and 14/1) and General Principle (PU at 14/1)
2020 - Elwood (Fell at 18/1)
I completely agree about the trend being unlikely to last, it makes no sense at all that Gordon hasn't mopped up in this race like all the other.
Only one horse has gone off bigger than 25/1, and Farclas surely wouldn't?
I can see the upside, although more likely money back than a single figure runner...but worth a poke to me too.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Viking Flagship View PostI know he's had a good mention already for the Kim Muir but I've just backed Farclas at 25/1 NRNB for this. I'd be surprised if he could get in the Kim Muir under the threshold - which would leave here or the Plate. If I could get 25s NRNB for the Plate I'd take that too, but only 16s there which looks a bit tight.
Not declared for the Thyestes on Thursday but there's a possibility they'd go to the big mid-trip handicap at DRF. As a former festival winner I'll be surprised if they aren't eyeing something at Cheltenham and whilst I realise Gordon doesn't have much of a track record in the Ultima, it's surely only a matter of time before that record is improved. This horse is still only a 7yo and is unexposed over longer trips & as a chaser - 25s NRNB is a bet for me.
Comment
-
Barry doesn't know what the UK handicapper will give him though, which is sure to be more than 145 and counts out the Kim Muir.
I've got both bases covered nrnb just in case, and like him wherever he turns up.Luck is a dividend of sweat. The more I sweat, the luckier I get.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BigChaang View Post
Yeah , that's what i thought too , 1,1,1,5,3 his chase record , @ 143 at the moment , what's the cut off for the K.M ?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Viking Flagship View PostI know he's had a good mention already for the Kim Muir but I've just backed Farclas at 25/1 NRNB for this. I'd be surprised if he could get in the Kim Muir under the threshold - which would leave here or the Plate. If I could get 25s NRNB for the Plate I'd take that too, but only 16s there which looks a bit tight.
Not declared for the Thyestes on Thursday but there's a possibility they'd go to the big mid-trip handicap at DRF. As a former festival winner I'll be surprised if they aren't eyeing something at Cheltenham and whilst I realise Gordon doesn't have much of a track record in the Ultima, it's surely only a matter of time before that record is improved. This horse is still only a 7yo and is unexposed over longer trips & as a chaser - 25s NRNB is a bet for me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Faugheen_Machine View Post
Totally agree VK. I've backed him for the K Muir (NRNB) but I think you're right in taking the 25s for the Ultima and had to follow suit as realistically he isn't getting under the 145 rating.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Viking Flagship View Post
Was he ever better than 12s NRNB for that race FM? I haven’t backed him in that as I thought the price was a bit rubbish and I would be tying up points in the slim hope he gets 145 which just looks so unlikely. Even if they could get 1 more mark-managing run into him the handicapper is really unlikely to drop a young unexposed horse any more than a pound, especially an Elliott trained one going for a Cheltenham handicap!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Viking Flagship View Post
Was he ever better than 12s NRNB for that race FM? I haven’t backed him in that as I thought the price was a bit rubbish and I would be tying up points in the slim hope he gets 145 which just looks so unlikely. Even if they could get 1 more mark-managing run into him the handicapper is really unlikely to drop a young unexposed horse any more than a pound, especially an Elliott trained one going for a Cheltenham handicap!Luck is a dividend of sweat. The more I sweat, the luckier I get.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spectre View Post
Elliott's sure to try though. Farcals is entered up at the DRF and nailed on to run poorly to make it as hard as possilbe for the UK handicapper to properly nail him with a big rise. Doubtful he gets a run in the Kim Muir I agree, and I suspect Run Wild Fred is the Gigi one for the race, with possibly Escaria Ten as Gordon's second horse depending on what mark he gets. However it's worth having Farcals onside nrnb just on the small chance he gets in, becasue he'd be close to a good thing you'd think, and definitely a short price. Having him rnb for both races is surely the way to play Farcals for anyone considering what to do.
Comment
Comment