Originally posted by Jrow
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Fat Jockey Patrons
Fat Jockey is a horse racing community focused on all the big races in the UK and Ireland. We don't charge users but if you have found the site useful then any support towards the running costs is appreciated.
Become a Patron!
You can also make a one-off donation here:
Become a Patron!
You can also make a one-off donation here:
See more
See less
General Chat
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Anay Turge View PostI don’t want to seem insensitive here, and I really do appreciate the bad image it casts on the sport (to those who need little excuse) but what really offends people here? Genuine question. It’s insensitive to the owners, but why are we so effected by it? He hasn’t hurt or injured the horse personally, just made a bad call by sitting on the horse. People have done a lot worse and received smaller punishments compared to what people are calling for on here/Twitter.
To be honest i cannot think of much worse than situations like this, where the horse that gives the sport its name is treated with such disrespect.
Cruelty or appearing to be cruel just cannot have a place in this sport. And anyone causing this, however meant, needs to be dealt with accordingly.
Banned for life would be my take on it.
May seem harsh to some, but the welfare of the sport and reputation of the sport are far more important than any one person.
We just cannot be seen to do anything else imo.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Faugheen_Machine View Post
Someone connected to the Charles Byrnes stable doped a horse to levels that could have killed him and put the jockey at serious risk, yet I don't think this got a mention on the forum.
That was several orders of magnitude worse than what Gordon has done. Charles is free to continue training in 6 months but Gordon is being hung out to dry.
We've probably all made serious errors of judgement in our lives, some of the things I've done would have made national headlines if I was in public view, but I think this has to be seen for what it is - a massive error of judgement.
He's knocking on the door of being champion trainer in Ireland and that doesn't happen if there's a animal welfare issue in his stable. He's just been an idiot, a complete idiot.
I'd like to see him fined and put on Luck on Sunday to apologise.
He will probably lose horses and powerful owners over this and that'll be punishment enough in my view.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rhinestone_Cowboy View Post
People should be free to express their emotions on this issue on here without being labelled a ‘drama queen’
Just as much as people should be free to point out when someone is being overly sensitive and overly dramatic. Which is what he was being
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jrow View Post
Quite right
Just as much as people should be free to point out when someone is being overly sensitive and overly dramatic. Which is what he was being
- Likes 1
Comment
-
It's clearly a deplorable photo and appallingly bad taste from someone who should know better, but I don't think he'll be banned, nor do I think the punishment will be too severe. There's no animal cruelty involved which is where the weight of a ban/suspension would have come from - and I think the biggest punishment will be on his reputation (and rightly bloody so!)
Plenty will never forgive him, I imagine owners will be removing horses as we speak and he'll generally pay the price regardless of what happens officially. It's really embarrassing in a sickening way. My worry is mainstream media will try and depict all trainers as cruel or not caring for animal welfare which is so far from the truth. The actions of one don't reflect the many, but tell that to outfits like the daily fucking mail.
The bit I cant get my head around is the grin and the peace sign - he should really be ashamed of himself.
Might lump Energumene Marsh NRNB
Comment
-
Originally posted by ryanh97 View Post
Do you think a fine will quite be enough in the court of public opinion FM? I don't and unfortunately that is what needs to be handled now.
It was in bad taste but I don't think it's the worst thing to ever happen. It's a split second decision that he got badly wrong. Howard Johnson and Charles Byrnes are at the other end of the scale for me.
It'll be trial by social media though. You only need to read the comments on there too see how poisonous people can be.
Comment
-
Originally posted by charlie View PostIt's clearly a deplorable photo and appallingly bad taste from someone who should know better, but I don't think he'll be banned, nor do I think the punishment will be too severe. There's no animal cruelty involved which is where the weight of a ban/suspension would have come from - and I think the biggest punishment will be on his reputation (and rightly bloody so!)
I've already seen a couple of posts from animal lovers that suggest as much. Trying to twist it, basically.
It's a slippery slope, not just for Gordon Elliott and the IRHB but also for horse racing in general.
Horses die on gallops, out in fields, on horse race tracks, all year round, having a photo with one is extremely insensitive, especially as these are in his 'care', and I can easily see why the immediate reaction is to 'throw the book at him', but ultimately there is no proof to suggest he actually killed that animal (I'm not suggesting he did either), and if that's the case any trainer that trains a horse that dies on the gallops is also liable. Or how about a jockey who rides a horse that dies whilst being ridden, are they liable? As I said, it's a slippery slope.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Faugheen_Machine View Post
I think it should be but I do understand that everyone has different levels of sensitivity towards these issues.
It was in bad taste but I don't think it's the worst thing to ever happen. It's a split second decision that he got badly wrong. Howard Johnson and Charles Byrnes are at the other end of the scale for me.
It'll be trial by social media though. You only need to read the comments on there too see how poisonous people can be.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rhinestone_Cowboy View Post
Who are you to point out if somebody is being overly sensitive then calling them a name for being so? You don’t have to agree with his or anyone’s perception and you are free to express your own, and if somebody called you a name for doing so I’d defend you also
Is offence not given, but taken?
Im posting my view of the situation, which is what freedom of opinion is all about. Its my opinion and just that, which concludes he was being a drama queen. If someone thinks differently, well thats fine because thats their view of the situation, we dont all have to agree and we dont all have to take offence by the words drama queen.
We live in a world now where people are scared to express their views and opinions for being criticised by and ostracised by the group
Comment
Comment