Originally posted by jono
View Post
For me, nearly 40/1 is right on the very edge of being a decent value bet. My logic is that whilst LR was competing in a poor 2m novice division, he was beating the likes of Us And Them easily, and I take the view he would have won the Arkle. I think JOB will have a good season and their plan is for a campaign over 2m - he was reportedly fit and well enough to have run at Aintree were it not for bastard Covid.
I must admit, I do feel like a bit of a hypocrite backing LR for the QMCC, and not PTKO. Suppose the question I have to answer - 'with 30% Arkle winners wining the QMCC, does winning a poor renewal (IMO) of the Arkle and being priced at 16/1 for the QMCC represent better value than a horse who didn't win the Arkle, hasn't raced for 2 years and is priced at 36/1'.
Have I just talked myself into backing PTKO?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f613c/f613c822053c0a2d2185505ca32ea8c20414bedf" alt="Smile"
Comment