Announcement

Collapse

Fat Jockey Patrons

Fat Jockey is a horse racing community focused on all the big races in the UK and Ireland. We don't charge users but if you have found the site useful then any support towards the running costs is appreciated.
Become a Patron!

You can also make a one-off donation here:
See more
See less

Related Doubles (ideas)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Yeah, good luck Jim

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Fouroverthrutwo View Post

      Let's hope for a Faugheen_Machine MKII - Good luck pal
      No where near them levels like mainly because i never went with the acca too but would be biggest winner ive ever had regardless!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by darlojim View Post

        No where near them levels like mainly because i never went with the acca too but would be biggest winner ive ever had regardless!
        You did well to avoid State Man in the bet too, Jim.

        Best of luck. That the best bet I've seen in a long while!

        Comment


        • ….since they went NRNB, I’m using the daily Hills boost to put on a very small stakes e/w double. With NRNB it feels like a low risk bet to nothing. Pinched a ‘related FJ’ one today. You never know;

          Best Years Yet (Coral) & First Street (County) @ 2,612-1.
          Last edited by Eggs; 20 January 2025, 07:42 AM.

          Comment


          • ….the ‘Twisty Wednesday’ e/w double;

            Potters Charm (Turn)
            Matata (CC)

            407-1 PP/BFSB

            Comment


            • As mentioned by Quevega in the novice hurdlers thread, Lulamba would surely only go to the supreme if Palladium looks like a machine. So a very small stakes cover double on Lulamba for the supreme and Palladium for the triumph makes appeal at 577/1 with paddy’s/betfair

              Comment


              • Originally posted by BagOfHammers View Post
                As mentioned by Quevega in the novice hurdlers thread, Lulamba would surely only go to the supreme if Palladium looks like a machine. So a very small stakes cover double on Lulamba for the supreme and Palladium for the triumph makes appeal at 577/1 with paddy’s/betfair
                Been waiting for more to price him up. 33's a nice surprise.
                33-1 and 16-1 makes that worth a small bet I reckon. shame they dropped palladium from 25's.
                If it happened then naturally it would be more like a 12-1 double.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by BagOfHammers View Post
                  As mentioned by Quevega in the novice hurdlers thread, Lulamba would surely only go to the supreme if Palladium looks like a machine. So a very small stakes cover double on Lulamba for the supreme and Palladium for the triumph makes appeal at 577/1 with paddy’s/betfair
                  Surely the owners aren't going to agree to running Lulamba against Salvator Mundi? Palladium nothing to do with them.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Can't Catch Me View Post

                    Surely the owners aren't going to agree to running Lulamba against Salvator Mundi? Palladium nothing to do with them.
                    Even if Mundi doesn't make it I still give it no chance of happening.

                    Comment


                    • I’d say Salvator (Supreme) and Lulamba (Triumph) are probably 2 of the most bet horses on here that were big odds and now short priced favs.

                      Can just imagine the pain it would cause if Lulamba won the Supreme and fucked both bets up with potentially huge returns on both races down the swanny

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by HoldenTheReins View Post

                        Even if Mundi doesn't make it I still give it no chance of happening.
                        Not sure I'd go with that.
                        If Palladium looks really good then it will definitely be tempting. Especially if Mundi ruled out.
                        Can't see why you'd be so adam ant especially as they bothered to enter today.

                        Nico could ride both which would please connections.
                        The supreme does not look deep and even shallower with Mundi out.

                        But a few things have to happen I get that, it's not something you'd expect or should expect to happen for sure.
                        Palladium might bomb on Thursday and this little chat will be a distant memory like 99.9% of the shit on here

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Quevega View Post

                          Not sure I'd go with that.
                          If Palladium looks really good then it will definitely be tempting. Especially if Mundi ruled out.
                          Can't see why you'd be so adam ant especially as they bothered to enter today.

                          Nico could ride both which would please connections.
                          The supreme does not look deep and even shallower with Mundi out.

                          But a few things have to happen I get that, it's not something you'd expect or should expect to happen for sure.
                          Palladium might bomb on Thursday and this little chat will be a distant memory like 99.9% of the shit on here
                          I meant if Mundi didn't make the supreme I still can't see Lulamba going there. Not fussed about Palladium.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by HoldenTheReins View Post

                            I meant if Mundi didn't make the supreme I still can't see Lulamba going there. Not fussed about Palladium.
                            I know what you meant. That was easy.
                            What's harder to understand is how you don't see Palladium as being the key to any possibility.
                            But have a lie down I reckon. I already am.
                            You're obviously more of a doer and a hoper, than a thinker. Pro's and cons really.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Quevega View Post

                              I know what you meant. That was easy.
                              What's harder to understand is how you don't see Palladium as being the key to any possibility.
                              But have a lie down I reckon. I already am.
                              You're obviously more of a doer and a hoper, than a thinker. Pro's and cons really.
                              Got to have strong views in some cases otherwise you'd be thinking about covering every possible angle.

                              Could it it happen, possibly but I'd just write it off happening.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by HoldenTheReins View Post

                                Got to have strong views in some cases otherwise you'd be thinking about covering every possible angle.

                                Could it it happen, possibly but I'd just write it off happening.

                                Brilliant. I've got you from no chance to possibly.
                                Absolutely agree. Over thinking and over covering is probably a bad habit for sure.
                                I blame the fuckers entering him - to tease.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X