Originally posted by spotthediff
View Post
Between 1975 - 2004 the Irish never surpassed 7 winners and averaged 3.7 per year. Since 2004 they've average 11.8 winners, with a clear and steady gradual climb over the last 10, culminating in 23 winners last year. This was not out of blue nor was it a surprise. Down playing this dominance, or calling it recency bias is IMO a fast way to the ante post poor house. Things will eventually change and it's up to us as punters to adapt and change when they do, but why on earth would anyone have large a number of ante post dockets on British trained runners in the face of these numbers? Outside of handicaps, 3 Irish trainers win over 50% of all races over the last 8 years, and the Irish won won 82% of races despite only fielding 40% of festival runners.
Re Stage Star, the above is not the sole reason I am not backing him, but it is a reason and a legitimate one to boot. He's a low 140's rated hurdler with what I think is rubbish form. The Irish novice hurdle trials tend to be deeper and more competitive than here, which IMO produces novices that have more better experience to handle the demands of a festival. People can agree or disagree with this point, but thats born out in the numbers as the Irish have have won 7 of the last 8 runnings of this. Challow winners have a terrible record at the festival, Paul Nicholls has a terrible record in the race and has aimed much better ones than SS - I just don't think he'll win.
I could of course be wrong and thats fine, but, history tells me I'm going to be right way more often than I'm wrong, so I'm happy running that risk based on what I know now.
Comment