Originally posted by Captain Chris
View Post
I apply my own ratings to horses that are climbing the ladder, and always de-rate anything that wins by a wide margin at Haydock and Ascot.
I use RPR's as a guide first and then look at why they might be right or wrong, and hopefully I can find and edge at some point by adding to or taking away from the the RPR first and the official rating second.
I've not seen a study on ratings at different courses, or a ratings service that applies them differently. In some ways it's better that there isn't though, as the betting advantage because of the subjectivity in them would potentially be lost.
Comment