Tweet
How anyone can pick holes with a horse that is 7/7 is weird. Until he is beaten he has no flaws.
-
-
Originally posted by The Beast View Post
Wow.
I'm a bit baffled, I don't know how best to explain just how wrong that is as a concept.Comment
-
I'm struggling to fathom how you could use so few words and be so spectacularly wrongOriginally posted by The Beast View Post
From a betting perspective it always comes back to value, and a horse that's 7/7 equals a price of 5/4. Any horse (let alone novice) that short at Cheltenham should be picked at because every horse has 'holes', no horse is flawless and every horse is beatable, even more so at the most competitive race meet of the entire season, and at a place that's historically proven to be a wasteland for the proverbial certainty.Comment
-
And that's from the Voice of reason deputy.Originally posted by charlie View PostI'm struggling to fathom how you could use so few words and be so spectacularly wrong
From a betting perspective it always comes back to value, and a horse that's 7/7 equals a price of 5/4. Any horse (let alone novice) that short at Cheltenham should be picked at because every horse has 'holes', no horse is flawless and every horse is beatable, even more so at the most competitive race meet of the entire season, and at a place that's historically proven to be a wasteland for the proverbial certainty.Comment
-
OBJECTION and don’t dare overruleOriginally posted by quevega View Post
That’s me
Psychopant pant pant
Comment
-
I Wouldn't dare. Mr Pie.Originally posted by Humble Pie View PostOBJECTION and don’t dare overrule
That’s me
Psychopant pant pant
You can self proclaim anything on here.
(you've just made me google Peter Simon)
born in Sheffield like me, and last seen slagging off UK based Polish and Latvians on the Ideal World shopping channel,
Preferred him on Double Dare though.Comment
-
Im struggling CharlieOriginally posted by charlie View PostI'm struggling to fathom how you could use so few words and be so spectacularly wrong
From a betting perspective it always comes back to value, and a horse that's 7/7 equals a price of 5/4. Any horse (let alone novice) that short at Cheltenham should be picked at because every horse has 'holes', no horse is flawless and every horse is beatable, even more so at the most competitive race meet of the entire season, and at a place that's historically proven to be a wasteland for the proverbial certainty.Where do I compare him to betting please.
I am purely stating his spectacular form figures.And like it or not he is flawless to date correct , yes or no!.
You best goggle Frankels form figures to help you out before you reply , I hear Ballydoyle still working out how to beat the great horse
Comment
-
Int that pretty much the same as saying any unbeaten horse is flawless (has no weakness and is perfect).Originally posted by The Beast View PostIm struggling CharlieWhere do I compare him to betting please.
I am purely stating his spectacular form figures.And like it or not he is flawless to date correct , yes or no!.
You best goggle Frankels form figures to help you out before you reply , I hear Ballydoyle still working out how to beat the great horse
Like every once raced maiden winner in history (until defeated) ?
Hard to argue with that logic.Comment
-
Or is there a certain number of runs unbeaten when you reach perfection ?Comment
-
Originally posted by quevega View PostCan I ask where in original message did I use the wording PERFECTION?Where did I say every horse in training , even after one run?
We are discussing one horse who has won left hand , right handed , at the highest level on various grounds.Comment
-
Frankel wasn't flawless.Originally posted by The Beast View PostIm struggling CharlieWhere do I compare him to betting please.
I am purely stating his spectacular form figures.And like it or not he is flawless to date correct , yes or no!.
You best goggle Frankels form figures to help you out before you reply , I hear Ballydoyle still working out how to beat the great horse
He was too keen at least once and didn't alway settle.
He was still the best thing ever....but not flawless.Comment
-
[QUOTE=Kevloaf;135733]Frankel wasn't flawless.
He was too keen at least once and didn't alway settle.
He was still the best thing ever....but not flawless.[/QUOTE
Ive been dry all January , im seriously tempted.
Comment
-
Get yourself a rum Beasty boy. You're not thinking clearly
#DrinkResponsiblyComment
-
Originally posted by Kevloaf View PostGet yourself a rum Beasty boy. You're not thinking clearly
#DrinkResponsibly Definately clear in mind but getting impression the forum has a few artists in the ranks
Comment
-
As figures 1111111 is flawless, but that doesn't make him a flawless horse, nor does it make his form spectacular. Surely you see that right? Bringing Frankel into a Cheltenham debate in JanuaryOriginally posted by The Beast View PostIm struggling CharlieWhere do I compare him to betting please.
I am purely stating his spectacular form figures.And like it or not he is flawless to date correct , yes or no!.
You best goggle Frankels form figures to help you out before you reply , I hear Ballydoyle still working out how to beat the great horse
Comment
Comment