....can apprentices take advantage of weight allowance in Cheltenham handicaps? Just thinking of TBO.
Announcement
Collapse
Fat Jockey Patrons
Fat Jockey is a horse racing community focused on all the big races in the UK and Ireland. We don't charge users but if you have found the site useful then any support towards the running costs is appreciated.
Become a Patron!
You can also make a one-off donation here:
Become a Patron!
You can also make a one-off donation here:
See more
See less
Stupid Questions
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Lobos View Post
Yeah, back all of Mullins
2012 - Pique Sous 3rd 12/1
2013 - Briar Hill 1st 25/1
2014 - Shaneshill 2nd 7/2
2015 - Bellshill 10th 14/1
2016 - Bacardys 3rd 16/1
2017 - Next Destination 4th 10/1
2018 - Carefully Selected 2nd 6/1 was injured so jockey change
I thought my tactic was over following Ruby's retirement, but the new Mullins number 1, Townend, steered Ferny Hollow to victory at 11/1 last year.
Nothing very scientific, but I don't really care for spending much time on bumpers. Tend to watch them from the bar anyway...
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Does the handicapper take account of a claimer when assessing the run of a horse?
For example if a 140 horse has a jockey on board claiming 7lbs and runs to 140, would the handicapper drop him cos he’s effectively run below his rating.
Or is it the price you pay for trying to ‘game the system’? I know you’re not doing anything wrong but you know what I mean.
Comment
-
Saw the post race interview with Aidan Coleman at Catterick earlier where he talked of heavy at Catterick being like soft at Wetherby. It's never really crossed my mind before but now i'm curious if anyone has ever looked into just how heavy is heavy, how good is good etc... at certain courses (not sure how you'd even quantify it?!) or if it's so trivial and open to interpretation that there's not much point/it'd be impossible. I suspect the latter, but here we are, live from the stupid questions thread...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Atlantic Viking View PostSaw the post race interview with Aidan Coleman at Catterick earlier where he talked of heavy at Catterick being like soft at Wetherby. It's never really crossed my mind before but now i'm curious if anyone has ever looked into just how heavy is heavy, how good is good etc... at certain courses (not sure how you'd even quantify it?!) or if it's so trivial and open to interpretation that there's not much point/it'd be impossible. I suspect the latter, but here we are, live from the stupid questions thread...
But that wouldn’t explain why it’s always desperate at Haydock, no matter
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brital View Post
I thought there was a stick they dropped now to give a reading that should be the same no matter which course you’re at?
But that wouldn’t explain why it’s always desperate at Haydock, no matter
Comment
-
Originally posted by Atlantic Viking View Post
Yeah there's the going stick, which i've always assumed is the same everywhere?! Just curious as regardless, conditions at courses are often described as being markedly different/unique.
As will the moisture content %.
Not sure exactly what the going stick measures, whether it's just how far it goes in, when given a set amount of pressure, or is more sophisticated than that.
And obviously they only check the going at designated areas of each course.
Some courses will have more higher ground, than lower and vice versa.
Then there are of course shaded areas and protected areas of ground at many courses.
Comment
Comment