Tweet
Originally posted by Kevloaf
View Post
Mister Fisher out to 40/1
Might put that up next time just to lock in the advantage against DJ
Just for clarification, the whole point of this is just to highlight that the markets shouldn't automatically cut whatever they put up on Upping The Ante.
I understand fully that they are restricted by putting up selections once a week, which is why I'm trying to show that perhaps that even I could do the same in this format.
It doesn't mean I think I'm better than Gavin Lynch or David Jennings by any stretch or that they wouldn't have amazing bets outside of the constraints of the show. I have no doubt they both would do much better than they can do in this format... but that doesn't mean that format should be celebrated or affect the markets like it does.
Personally, I'll be staggered if I don't have an 11th successive profitable festival and I'm sure even my "haters
" would struggle to see that happening. It's not secret that my approach is not 'one-horse-per-race', so this format isn't in my favour but the point of me attempting this is to highlight that this forum will highlight better bets (or certainly massively comparable) if people wanted to follow them blindly too.
People dislike Pricewise selections getting cut, for me, this Upping The Ante is the same. If the bookies didn't cut the prices immediately, I wouldn't ever have mentioned it... but it does. For me, I consider that lazy punting and think [we] as a group of people who dedicate time to this, are better than the average lazy punter backing something like that show, blindly.
Might put that up next time just to lock in the advantage against DJ
Just for clarification, the whole point of this is just to highlight that the markets shouldn't automatically cut whatever they put up on Upping The Ante.
I understand fully that they are restricted by putting up selections once a week, which is why I'm trying to show that perhaps that even I could do the same in this format.
It doesn't mean I think I'm better than Gavin Lynch or David Jennings by any stretch or that they wouldn't have amazing bets outside of the constraints of the show. I have no doubt they both would do much better than they can do in this format... but that doesn't mean that format should be celebrated or affect the markets like it does.
Personally, I'll be staggered if I don't have an 11th successive profitable festival and I'm sure even my "haters
" would struggle to see that happening. It's not secret that my approach is not 'one-horse-per-race', so this format isn't in my favour but the point of me attempting this is to highlight that this forum will highlight better bets (or certainly massively comparable) if people wanted to follow them blindly too.People dislike Pricewise selections getting cut, for me, this Upping The Ante is the same. If the bookies didn't cut the prices immediately, I wouldn't ever have mentioned it... but it does. For me, I consider that lazy punting and think [we] as a group of people who dedicate time to this, are better than the average lazy punter backing something like that show, blindly.
? fair play thou spoken a lot of sense and look forward to see how it pans out.
Comment